This is indicated by an increase in the average reading comprehension value of 15.98 from the average results before the implementation of the SQ3R learning strategy by 55.83 and after the implementation of the SQ3R strategy by 71.81.
The results of the study showed that there was an increase in the ability to read comprehension in the text of the student's observation report. This study uses the Pre Experiment research method with the One-Group Pretest-Postest design. (3) describe the effectiveness of the use of SQ3R in learning to read the text of the observation report.
(2) describe the ability of students to read the text of the observation report after using SQ3R. The formulation of the problem in this study are (1) How is the ability to read text comprehension reports on students' observations? (2) What is the ability to read understanding text reports of students' observations after using the SQ3R strategy? (3) Is the application of the SQ3R learning strategy effective in learning to read the text of the observation report? The purpose of this study is (1) to describe the ability of students to read the understanding of the text of the observation report.
The ability of students to read comprehension is relatively low, especially in understanding the reading text of the report of observations, so we need a learning innovation that can improve students' ability to read comprehension through the application of the SQ3R strategy. So from this analysis can be concluded that the method SQ3R motivation and learning outcomes is higher than the motivation and learning outcomes conventional methods.Keywords: methods SQ3R, motivation and learning outcomes Results motivation and learning outcomes that motivated the data analysis methods SQ3R average of 129.56 and an average of 119.11 conventional methods (2) Analysis of the average data overall learning outcomes of the students taught using methods SQ3R of 26.56 and 22.33 for the conventional method difference 4.23 (3) Analysis of average data results that are taught using methods SQ3R highest score 30.67 High Group and group the highest score 22.24 Low 8.23 difference in numbers average data analysis of learning outcomes are taught with methods SQ3R study group Low highest score 26.28 and Conventional High group scores highest score group low 26.28 and the lowest scoring average 18.39 7.89 difference in numbers. Research subjects a class XI student of SMAN 12 Pekanbaru.
This study is an experimental research that distinguishes SQ3R method and conventional methods as well as motivation and learning outcomes. Implementation of the research in accordance with the learning procedure starting from planning, core activities and weekend activities. This study is a quasi experimental study aimed to describe the use of methods SQ3R and motivation and student learning outcomes learning materials reading comprehension.
0 kommentar(er)
